Home / Software & Service News / Apple’s self-driving car future remains as fuzzy as ever

Apple’s self-driving car future remains as fuzzy as ever



We have known for a long time that Apple is working on an autonomous car project. But it was still remarkable to hear Apple CEO Tim Cook confirm the news in a public interview.

“We’re focusing on autonomous systems,” Cook said in a Bloomberg Television appearance on June 5. “It’s a core technology that we view as very important.” He went on to call it “the mother of all AI projects” and added that it’s “probably one of the most difficult AI projects to work on.”

Though Apple has historically been reticent to talk about its future, Cook and the company have gotten a bit more loose-lipped in recent years, blabbing about Apple’s interest in augmented reality, for instance, before announcing a product at the company’s recent Worldwide Developer’s Conference.

In this case, Cook managed to say something without really saying much. We knew, via patents and regulatory filings and press reports, that Apple had some kind of AV project cooking. Cook told Bloomberg that with disruption in self-driving tech, electric vehicles, and ride-hailing, automobiles represent a rapidly changing area.

“There is a major disruption looming there,” Cook said. “You’ve got kind of three vectors of change happening generally in the same time frame.”

Beyond that, Cook didn’t make any great revelations. In terms of the “autonomous systems” he mentioned, well, that could refer to an incredibly wide range of things. A platform that other companies plug into their cars to turn them into AVs? An actual Apple car? The latter would seem to be folly, but who knows?

What is clear is that even if Apple has endless resources to pursue this dream, the company faces remarkable odds. In April, when it received permission from California to test AV cars on the state’s roads, for instance, Apple was the 30th player to receive such status. Competitors higher on that list include Tesla, Google, Uber, Ford, Volkswagen, and Mercedes.

If Apple decides to create a software system to enable other manufacturers to create AVs, the question remains as to whether Apple can develop anything truly superior. And even if it does, most large companies have a profound fear of becoming so deeply dependent on a giant like Apple. (Cough, music industry, cough).

This would seem to push Apple to make its own vehicle and control the whole experience, as it has traditionally done in other markets. But creating the supply network and manufacturing capacity to produce a meaningful number of cars is a decades-long project. Apple can, of course, afford to take the long view. But while there is contract manufacturing for autos, it’s nowhere near as extensive as it is for, say, consumer electronics.

Finally, anyone pushing AVs is pushing against huge cultural and economic inertia. Hybrid electric vehicles are a pretty good example of how slow the market for cars can be to change. Since 1999, when HEVs started to become more available, the market has grown, but at a crawl.

In 2014, there were 347,000 HEVs sold in the U.S., a number that actually fell from the previous year. That was out of 7.9 million autos sold in the U.S. that year — or about 4 percent. In 2016, meanwhile, 159,139 electric vehicles were sold.

These are tiny numbers, making it tough to recover any massive investment in infrastructure for manufacturing.

And that’s without even looking at challenges like regulatory changes needed, insurance reform, or consumer education.

Of course, we can dream that Apple being Apple it could change all of this with one magical product. But the reality is that widespread use of AVs likely remains decades away. Even with Apple’s remarkably recent history, its ability to impact this sector will likely remain limited.

Click Here For Original Source Of The Article

About Ms. A. C. Kennedy

Ms. A. C. Kennedy
My name is Ms A C Kennedy and I am a Health practitioner and Consultant by day and a serial blogger by night. I luv family, life and learning new things. I especially luv learning how to improve my business. I also luv helping and sharing my information with others. Don't forget to ask me anything!

Check Also

UK drone rules will require you to take safety tests

UK drone rules will require you to take safety tests

US officials might be easing up on drone regulations, but their UK counterparts are pushing forward. The British government has instituted rules that require you to not only register any robotic aircraft weighing over 250g (0.55lbs), but to take a "safety awareness" test to prove you understand the drone code. Regulators hope that this will lead to fewer drones flying over airports and otherwise causing havoc in British skies. Not that they're taking any chances -- the UK is also planning wider use of geofencing to prevent drones from flying into dangerous airspace.

The new rules come following a study highlighting the dangers of wayward drones. A smaller drone isn't necessarily safer than its larger alternatives, for example -- many of those more compact models have exposed rotors that can do a lot of damage. A drone weighing around 400 g (0.88lbs) can crack the windscreen of a helicopter, while all but the heaviest drones will have trouble cracking the windscreen of an airliner (and then only at speeds you'd expect beyond the airport). While you might not cause as much chaos as some have feared, you could still create a disaster using a compact drone.

It's nothing new to register drones, of course, and it doesn't appear to have dampened enthusiasm in the US. The test adds a wrinkle, though: how willing are you to buy a drone if you know you'll have to take a quiz? The test likely won't slow sales too much, if at all, but it could give people one more reason to pause before buying a drone on impulse. Manufacturers appear to be in favor of the new rulebook, at any rate -- DJI tells the BBC that the UK is striving for a "reasonable" solution that balances safety with a recognition of the advantages that drones can bring to public life.

Source: Gov.uk (1), (2)

css.php